Lane Monkey vs Grafana
Looking for a Grafana alternative for CI/CD monitoring?
Grafana is the gold standard for metrics dashboards. But building a CI/CD pipeline view from scratch — configuring data sources, writing queries, arranging panels — takes time your team doesn't have. Lane Monkey gives you that view out of the box.
What Grafana does well
Grafana is an incredible tool — it's the most popular open-source dashboarding platform for a reason. We use it ourselves for infrastructure metrics.
- Incredibly flexible dashboarding — if you can query it, you can visualize it
- Open source with a massive community and thriving plugin ecosystem
- Excellent support for Prometheus, InfluxDB, and dozens of other data sources
- Industry standard for infrastructure and application metrics visualization
Where it falls short for CI/CD monitoring
Grafana excels at visualizing time-series metrics. But CI/CD pipelines aren't time-series data — they're discrete events. Making Grafana work for pipeline monitoring means fighting the tool instead of using it.
- Requires building dashboards from scratch — there’s no out-of-the-box CI/CD pipeline view waiting for you
- Needs data sources configured and maintained — you’ll need Prometheus exporters or custom data pipelines to get CI/CD data in
- Time-series focus doesn’t map naturally to pipeline runs, which are discrete events with pass/fail/running states
- Ongoing maintenance overhead — someone on the team has to own the Grafana instance, update plugins, and fix broken queries
How Lane Monkey is different
Instead of building a CI/CD dashboard from scratch, Lane Monkey gives you one that's ready the moment you connect your tools. No queries, no panels, no maintenance.
Pre-built CI/CD views
No dashboard building required. Connect your tools and your pipeline board is ready instantly. Every lane shows real-time workflow runs.
Zero dashboard configuration
No PromQL queries to write, no panels to arrange, no data sources to configure. Add a lane, pick a repo, done.
Kanban fits pipelines naturally
Pipeline runs are discrete events — pass, fail, running. A Kanban board maps to this perfectly. Time-series graphs don’t.
Zero-config integrations
One PAT per service. No exporters, no agents, no custom data pipelines. Lane Monkey talks directly to GitHub, Vercel, Sentry, and more.
Feature comparison
How Lane Monkey and Grafana stack up for CI/CD pipeline monitoring.
| Feature | Lane Monkey | |
|---|---|---|
| Out-of-box CI/CD view | ||
| Setup complexity | High | Minimal |
| Maintenance needed | Ongoing | None |
| Pipeline-native UI | ||
| Drag-and-drop organization | ||
| Hosted option | ||
| Multi-tool aggregation |
Make the switch in under a minute.
Free to start, Pro when your team grows. No dashboards to build, no data sources to configure, no queries to maintain. Just your pipelines, live.